Main Article Content

Abstract

Open Government Data (OGD) has gained significant attention as a tool for promoting transparency, enhancing public trust, and improving bureaucratic accountability. However, the impact of OGD on these factors, particularly in emerging economies, remains underexplored. This research investigates the ethical implications and effectiveness of OGD in fostering trust and accountability within the public sector in emerging economies. The primary objective is to evaluate how OGD influences public trust in government and the accountability of bureaucratic systems. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews across five emerging economies. The findings suggest that while OGD can improve public trust and bureaucratic accountability, its effectiveness is highly contingent on the strength of the institutional context. Countries with stronger democratic frameworks and institutional capacity experienced greater improvements in trust and accountability, while weaker institutions limited OGD’s impact. The study concludes that OGD alone does not automatically lead to increased transparency; instead, institutional readiness and capacity play critical roles in determining its success. This research contributes to the literature by offering a nuanced understanding of OGD’s role in enhancing governance in emerging economies, highlighting both its potential and its limitations.

Keywords

Bureaucratic Accountability Emerging Economies Open Government Data Public Trust Transparency

Article Details

Download
PDF
History
Submitted
2026-06-14
Published
2026-06-14

References

  1. Abeysekera, I., & Samaduzzaman, M. (2026). Sustainability consciousness and non-government organisational performance in Bangladesh. Acta Psychologica, 264, 106584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106584
  2. Afadzinu, S. K. (2026). Appointing the auditor-general: Political control and audit transparency in Ghana. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 38(2), 299–317. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-03-2025-0075
  3. Amaral, E., Naranjo-Zolotov, M., & Bação, F. (2026). Unequal AI readiness: Institutional and digital disparities in e-government across the European Union. Telematics and Informatics, 107, 102400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2026.102400
  4. Anand, A., Rottig, D., Stocker, M., & Bodolica, V. (2026). A multilevel framework for analysing organisational misconduct in emerging economies. International Business Review, 35(2), 102563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2026.102563
  5. Andargie, B. S., Moges, Y. A., Alemu, A. E., & Tensay, A. T. (2026). The impact of spiritual and integrated leadership on organizational commitment in Ethiopian public universities. Strategic Business Research, 2(1), 100061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbr.2026.100061
  6. Anning-Dorson, T., & Senanu, B. (2026). Mobile money adoption: Unequal pathways to financial well-being across small enterprises. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 229, 124706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2026.124706
  7. Anomah, S. (2025). Assessing the institutional readiness and capacity for AI adoption in public audit institutions in developing countries: Evidence from Ghana. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 20, 100260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2025.100260
  8. Barsekh-Onji, A., Torres Hernandez, Z., & Cardoso Espinosa, E. O. (2025). Advancing smart public administration: Challenges and benefits of artificial intelligence. Urban Governance, 5(3), 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2025.06.003
  9. Bian, X., Wang, B., & Yang, A. (2025). The trust trifecta: How transparency, ethics, and benefits shape public confidence in government AI. Government Information Quarterly, 42(4), 102083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2025.102083
  10. Bokhari, S. A. A. (2026). Artificial intelligence, governance, and economic growth: Toward a new theory of digital developmentalism. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 13, 102842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102842
  11. Bozkurt, Y., Rossmann, A., Pervez, Z., & Ramzan, N. (2025). Development and evaluation of an urban data governance reference model based on design science research. Government Information Quarterly, 42(2), 102025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2025.102025
  12. Chakraborty, I., & Kumar, N. (2026). Trust as institutional infrastructure: Balancing isomorphism and legitimacy in the governance of GenAI for healthcare. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 226, 124615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2026.124615
  13. Dauvergne, P. (2026). Corporate earth system accountability: Governance strategies to reduce microplastic pollution from consumer products. Earth System Governance, 27, 100314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2026.100314
  14. DeVito, N. J., Morley, J., & Goldacre, B. (2024). Barriers and best practices to improving clinical trials transparency at UK public research institutions: A qualitative interview study. Health Policy, 142, 104991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.104991
  15. Dimand, A.-M., Patrucco, A. S., Abutabenjeh, S., & Brunjes, B. M. (2026). Insights Into Public Procurement: Principles, Processes, and Partnership Dynamics. In V. Ratten (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Business Management (First Edition) (pp. 785–794). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-13701-3.00350-9
  16. Dutta, K. D., & Saha, M. (2026). Does women’s financial inclusion reduce corruption? Role of socioeconomic and institutional factors. World Development, 203, 107392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2026.107392
  17. Eizaguirre, M., Gómez Funes, A., García-Monleón, F., & Carrero, O. (2026). Bridging digital divides: Infrastructure, transparency and mobile compatibility in citizen-centric e-governance across the EU. European Journal of Innovation Management, 29(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-05-2025-0670
  18. Elbehairy, F., Mora, L., & Soe, R.-M. (2025). Who are you? Examining the multifaceted innovation roles of municipal governments in AI governance. Technovation, 147, 103303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103303
  19. Eren Vural, I., Herder, M., & Graham, J. E. (2026). Competitive interdependence: A critical political economy of regulation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Social Science & Medicine, 391, 118759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118759
  20. Goyal, R., Deshmukh, S. G., & Bolia, N. (2026). Navigating barriers to GenAI adoption in public administration: A systematic evaluation and policy roadmap. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 105, 102461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2026.102461
  21. Inyang, P. O. (2026). Citizen science, mobile technology, and environmental justice in Africa: Rights-based legal pathways for community empowerment. World Development, 200, 107254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2025.107254
  22. Liaw, S.-T., & Godinho, M. A. (2026). Chapter 8—Governance, trust, and reciprocity to advance digital health maturity. In S.-T. Liaw, J. Jonnagaddala, M. A. Godinho, & Z. S. Y. Wilkins-Wong (Eds.), Digital Health Maturity: Quality, Interoperability, and Innovation (pp. 195–219). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-95260-6.00008-3
  23. Megawati, S., Pradana, G. W., Eprilianto, D. F., Hamsinah, H., & Syamsul, M. R. (2025). Synergistic modelling of green and digital local government on sustainable development performance: A case study of booming city. Journal of Modelling in Management, 21(1), 215–241. https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-10-2024-0343
  24. Mikkelsen, K. S. (2026). How perceived red tape in freedom of information processing shapes public servants’ trust in citizens: Evidence from Slovakia and Croatia. Government Information Quarterly, 43(2), 102135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2026.102135
  25. Muhammad, A. S., Hammed, S., Shishah, W., & Isiaku, L. (2025). Strategic enablers of sustainable AI-driven public service transformation in Nigeria: A fuzzy DEMATEL-based model. Technological Sustainability, 4(4), 380–401. https://doi.org/10.1108/TECHS-06-2025-0130
  26. Quinn, S., Waheduzzaman, W., & Djurkovic, N. (2025). Unmasking organizational factors contributing to bullying behaviors in public-sector workplaces: Insights from the Australian public sector. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 39(3), 349–365. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-11-2024-0387
  27. Razak, S., Syahabuddin, S., & Raking, J. (2025). Assessing social impact in halal business practices: A maslahah-oriented framework for sustainable development. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 17(3), 898–922. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-10-2024-0450
  28. Rodhouse, T. S. G. H., Cuppen, E. H. W. J., Pesch, U., & Correljé, A. F. (2025). Challenge accepted: Sub-national government authorities and the legitimacy of co-creative redevelopment projects in fossil-industrial regions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 55, 100962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2025.100962
  29. Safie, S. I., Zulkifli, M., Sapry, H. R., & Bashah, S. R. M. (2025). Integrating individual and organizational perspectives: A TAM-TOE framework for ISO 27037 adoption in Malaysian government digital forensics agencies. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 11(3), 100595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100595
  30. Scaffidi, C. (2026). Ethics and justice in food systems. In P. Alexander (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Agriculture and Food Systems (Third Edition) (pp. 168–182). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-15976-3.00058-1
  31. Senadheera, S., Yigitcanlar, T., Desouza, K. C., Li, R. Y. M., Corchado, J., Mehmood, R., Mossberger, K., & Cheong, P. H. (2024). Metaverse as local government communication platform: A systematic review through the lens of publicness theory. Cities, 155, 105461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105461
  32. Tafoska, I., Bellazzecca, E., & Tropeano, T. (2026). Barriers and opportunities in outcome-based contracting for enabling social innovation: Insights from a collaborative, public−private pilot project in Italy. Social Enterprise Journal, 22(2), 274–293. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-07-2025-0154
  33. Tang, L., Zhao, H., Zhou, Z., Qian, Z., Hou, S., & Liu, B. (2025). Can government procurement drive corporate green technology innovation? Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Evaluation and Program Planning, 111, 102592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102592
  34. Thi Uyen Nguyen, T., Van Nguyen, P., Thi Ngoc Huynh, H., Truong, G. Q., & Do, L. (2024). Unlocking e-government adoption: Exploring the role of perceived usefulness, ease of use, trust, and social media engagement in Vietnam. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(2), 100291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100291
  35. Xiao, B. (2025). Agile and iterative governance: China’s regulatory response to AI. Computer Law & Security Review, 58, 106183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2025.106183